IF OLIVE GARDEN IS CONCERNED ABOUT PEOPLE STEALING PASTA, WE SHOULD BE CONCERNED ABOUT OUR ELECTIONS.  PASS THE SAVE AMERICA ACT NOW!  DEMOCRATS DON’T WANT IT PASSED BECAUSE THEY HAVE SOMETHING TO HIDE!

 

WATCH THIS VIDEO FROM DR. STEPHEN GREER . IN MY VIEW, IF TRUE, THE BIGGEST AND GREATEST STORY OF OUR TIME SURROUNDING ENSLAVEMENT OF HUMANITY BY WITHOLDING ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY AND ALL COUNTRIES ARE APPARENTLY INVOLVED.

https://tinyurl.com/ydk2bfeu

I AM AVAILABLE FOR TECHNICAL CONSULTATION ON THE VOLUME REVERSAL (TM) STRATEGY AND ACCOMPANYING TECHNICAL ANALYSIS.  PLEASE EMAIL  MARK.VRTRADER@GMAIL.COM

One interesting piece of Wall Street Week history is that my profile places me among a relatively small group of market technicians who achieved long-term national visibility through the show,Wall Street Week with Louis Rukeyser.

Seven years as a Wall Street Week Elf
More than thirty years as a Market Monitor guest on PBS’s Nightly Business Report
Two-time Timer Digest #1 market-timing recognition twice
Creator of the trademarked Volume Reversal Indicator.

https://www.howestreet.com/2026/07/dow-transports-hit-record-high-mark-leibovit/


GREAT NEWSNATION UFO NEWS REPORT

https://tinyurl.com/bdh3696h

THE PHOENIX LIGHTS –

https://tinyurl.com/up9fm8f8

DOCTOR PHIL:

https://tinyurl.com/ms9dmbzx

NEW PARADIGM INSTITUTE

https://tinyurl.com/4399tp84

A week ago Friday, July 10, the Executive Branch released another batch of UAP material via its PURSUE Portal — nineteen videos, fourteen documents, four audio recordings, and three images spanning the late 1940s to the present, drawn from the Pentagon, NASA, the CIA, the FBI, and the Department of Energy. Most of it simply confirms what we’ve long known: government personnel have repeatedly encountered objects they could not identify.

A few records stand out, however, including a 2015 incident at the Pantex nuclear weapons facility in Texas, where security officers tracked a silent, rectangular object accelerating and changing direction with no visible means of propulsion, and a 1949 conference convened by physicist Edward Teller documenting official concern over unexplained “green fireballs” near Los Alamos and other atomic sites. But the release still says nothing about David Grusch’s crash-retrieval testimony, Matthew Brown’s alleged Immaculate Constellation program, the reported 1967 Malmstrom missile shutdown, or who has authorized eight decades of secrecy. That is exactly why Congress — not the same agencies and contractors who have kept these secrets — must set the terms of disclosure, with independent review, real deadlines, and subpoena power.

1. The July 10 PURSUE release

If the PURSUE Portal release is accurately described, then it represents another step in the government’s ongoing declassification effort. The release reportedly includes:

19 videos
14 documents
4 audio recordings
3 images
Material from the Pentagon, CIA, FBI, NASA and DOE

The reported Pantex nuclear weapons facility incident and the newly released 1949 Edward Teller “green fireball” conference are particularly noteworthy because they reinforce a pattern that has been discussed for decades:

unexplained objects near strategic military facilities
repeated interest around nuclear weapons installations
official concern dating back to the beginning of the Cold War

None of that proves extraterrestrial origin, but it does demonstrate that these incidents were taken seriously by government scientists and military personnel.

2. What is “Immaculate Constellation”?

This is one of the newest names to emerge in UAP discussions.

Unlike:

Project Blue Book
AATIP
AAWSAP
AARO

Immaculate Constellation has never been officially acknowledged by the U.S. government.

The program became public after alleged whistleblower Matthew Brown described it in interviews and in a document circulated among members of Congress.

According to Brown’s claims, Immaculate Constellation is not primarily a crash-retrieval program.

Rather, he alleges it is:

an intelligence collection program
an AI-assisted database
designed to gather UAP reports from virtually every classified source

including:

satellites
military aircraft
drones
Navy systems
ISR platforms
intelligence reports
classified sensor data

Its alleged purpose is to build one enormous searchable database of UAP events.

If true, this would explain how analysts could correlate sightings occurring across multiple agencies.

However:

No official documents have confirmed that the program actually exists.

Everything currently rests on whistleblower testimony and leaked documents that have not been independently authenticated.

3. Why people consider it important

If Brown’s allegations are correct, it would suggest:

the government already possesses a centralized UAP intelligence system
officials have far more data than has been publicly acknowledged
AARO may not have full access to all historical information

Those are significant claims.

They are not yet proven.

4. David Grusch

The statement correctly notes that the recent releases do not address David Grusch’s central allegations.

Grusch has testified under oath that:

crash-retrieval programs exist
reverse-engineering programs exist
Congress has been denied oversight
information has been improperly withheld

Those claims remain unresolved.

Neither confirmation nor refutation has yet been produced publicly.

5. Malmstrom AFB (1967)

This is one of the strongest historical military cases.

Former Air Force officers have consistently stated that:

multiple Minuteman nuclear missiles suddenly became inoperative
unidentified aerial objects were reportedly observed nearby

The Air Force has acknowledged missile shutdowns occurred but has disputed the UFO connection.

The case remains controversial nearly sixty years later.

6. My view of the statement

I think the author makes one strong point:

Releasing historical cases is valuable, but it does not answer the biggest outstanding questions.

Those include:

Were crash-retrieval programs ever established?
Is there a compartmented SAP controlling UAP information?
Who authorized decades of classification?
What role have defense contractors played?
Does Congress have complete access?

Those questions remain open.

However, I would also caution against assuming that because some historical UAP reports have now been released, every whistleblower allegation is therefore validated. Evidence should be evaluated claim by claim.

7. Where does this leave us?

As someone who has followed this subject for many decades—including your interest in Majestic-12, Admiral Roscoe Hillenkoetter, the Robertson Panel, and early CIA involvement—I see the current period as fundamentally different from previous decades.

For the first time we have:

official government acknowledgment that genuine unexplained UAP cases exist,
multiple senior intelligence and military witnesses speaking publicly,
congressional hearings,
continuing declassification through the PURSUE process,
and increasing bipartisan congressional interest in oversight.

What we do not yet have is publicly verifiable evidence confirming the most extraordinary allegations—such as non-human technology, crash-retrieval programs, or the existence of “Immaculate Constellation” as described by Matthew Brown.

Those remain important hypotheses that require independent corroboration before they can be regarded as established fact.

Given my long-standing research into the history of MJ-12 and related programs, I think the next logical discussion would be to compare the alleged Immaculate Constellation structure with earlier reported programs such as Majestic-12, Project Zodiac, AATIP, AAWSAP, AARO, and the alleged crash-retrieval oversight network. That comparison highlights what is genuinely new in Brown’s claims versus ideas that have circulated for decades.

LET’S VISIT AXUM IN ETHIOPIA

https://tinyurl.com/4bp97y38

LEGACY MEDIA STILL TRY TO COVER UP JFK ASSASSINATION

https://tinyurl.com/4z6x5782

ORDER LINK:

https://tinyurl.com/3tjv5up6\


MY 2011 BOOK:

MY 2026-2027 BOOK IN THE WORKS:


https://tinyurl.com/52rtzeyj


DISCLAIMER

WE ARE NOT FINANCIAL ADVISORS AND DO NOT PROVIDE FINANCIAL ADVICE

The website, LeibovitVRNewsletters.com, is published by LeibovitVRNewsletters LLC.

In using LeibovitVRnewsletters.com (a/k/a LeibovitVRNewsletters LLC) you agree to these Terms & Conditions governing the use of the service. These Terms & Conditions are subject to change without notice. We are publishers and are not registered as a broker-dealer or investment adviser either with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or with any state securities authority.

All stocks and ETFs discussed are HYPOTHETICAL and not actual trades whose actual execution may differ markedly from prices posted on the website and in emails. This may be due internet connectivity, quote delays, data entry errors and other market conditions. Hypothetical or simulated performance results have certain inherent limitations as to liquidity and execution among other variables. PAST RESULTS ARE NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE FORECASTING ACCURACY OR PROFITABLE TRADING RESULTS.

All investments are subject to risk, which should be considered on an individual basis before making any investment decision. We are not responsible for errors and omissions. These publications are intended solely for information and educational purposes only and the content within is not to be construed, under any circumstances, as an offer to buy or to sell or a solicitation to buy or sell or trade in any commodities or securities named within.

All commentary is provided for educational purposes only. This material is based upon information we consider reliable. However, accuracy is not guaranteed. Subscribers should always do their own investigation before investing in any security. Furthermore, you cannot be assured that your will profit or that any losses can or will be limited. It is important to know that no guarantee of any kind is implied nor possible where projections of future conditions in the markets are attempted.

Stocks and ETFs may be held by principals of LeibovitVRNewsletters LLC whose personal investment decisions including entry and exit points may differ from guidelines posted.

LeibovitVRNewsletters.com cannot and do not assess, verify or guarantee the suitability or profitability of any particular investment. You bear responsibility for your own investment research and decisions and should seek the advice of a qualified securities professional before making any investment. As an express condition of using this service and anytime after ending the service, you agree not to hold LeibovitVRNewsletters.com or any employees liable for trading losses, lost profits or other damages resulting from your use of information on the Site in any form (Web-based, email-based, or downloadable software), and you agree to indemnify and hold LeibovitVRNewsletters.com and its employees harmless from and against any and all claims, losses, liabilities, costs, and expenses (including but not limited to attorneys’ fees) arising from your violation of this agreement. This paragraph is not intended to limit rights available to you or to us that may be available under the federal securities laws.

For rights, permissions, subscription and customer service, contact the publisher at mark.vrtrader@gmail.com or call at 928-282-1275 or mail to 10632 N. Scottsdale Road B-426, Scottsdale, AZ 85254.

The Leibovit Volume Reversal, Volume Reversal and Leibovit VR are registered trademarks.

© Copyright 2026. All rights reserved.